How Mueller’s path was muddied in two weeks

By Laura Jarrett

On December 1, all eyes in Washington were fixed on former national security adviser Michael Flynn pleading guilty to lying to the FBI. It was another sign that special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian meddling in the presidential election was gaining steam.

Nearly 24 hours later, top officials at the Justice Department had a problem.

Media reports surfaced Saturday morning that two top FBI officials had traded a series of text messages trashing then-presidential candidate Donald Trump and supporting Hillary Clinton.

Later that day, Mueller’s office, in a rare move, was quick to issue a statement addressing the texts — perhaps a recognition of the potential political upheaval brewing.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions directed FBI Director Christopher Wray to make “any necessary changes to his management and investigative teams.”

The head of the House Intelligence Committee threatened top officials at the Justice Department and FBI with contempt of Congress citations, hurling accusations that they’d been less than forthcoming about the text messages.

Defenders of the President, in search of any avenues to discredit, diminish and distract from Mueller’s work on the Russia investigation, have now focused their gaze directly inside the Justice Department and FBI, pouncing on newly perceived vulnerabilities that have bubbled up within a striking two-week span.

Until two weeks ago, Peter Strzok was not a household name outside the counterintelligence field, but within the FBI he’s considered one of the bureau’s top experts on Russia.

Strzok had played a lead role in the investigation into Clinton’s private email server and was involved in the FBI’s recommendation that no criminal charges be filed against the former secretary of state. He later helped oversee the beginnings of the probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 election.

CNN reported in mid-July that Strzok had joined Mueller’s team, but his time there was short-lived. He was removed after Mueller learned on July 27 about a stockpile of text messages exchanged between Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page through November 2016 in which the pair dreaded Trump winning the election. The texts were uncovered as part of a separate internal investigation looking into the FBI’s actions leading up to the 2016 election. That investigation is ongoing.

People who worked with Strzok describe him as a seasoned agent who never allowed political opinions to influence his work. His role as a leader in the Clinton email investigation was overseen by top FBI officials, some with Republican political leanings, and the prosecutors in Alexandria, Virginia, who helped oversee the investigation included Republicans, according to current and former officials close to the matter.

Strzok’s role in the Trump-Russia probe also doesn’t fit the portrayal by Republican critics, these officials say. CNN has reported that FBI counterintelligence agents who interviewed Flynn initially weren’t in favor of pursuing charges against him for lying in his interview with the FBI in January about conversations he had with Sergey Kislyak, Russia’s former ambassador to the US.

Strzok was among those who didn’t view Flynn’s answers as purposely false statements, the officials said.

An attorney for Strzok did not respond to a request for comment. Page could not be reached for comment.

The Justice Department and the special counsel’s office declined to comment for this story.

Various congressional investigators spent days clamoring to see the text messages for themselves and, in an unexpected move, the Justice Department rapidly turned over a set of roughly 375 texts to lawmakers on December 12 — the eve of a key congressional hearing — noting the “extraordinary accommodation” of releasing them in the midst of an internal investigation.

Reports detailing the extent of Strzok and Page’s dislike for Trump soon popped up from every major news outlet — priming the pump for a narrative that loomed over an oversight hearing before the House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday.

“These text messages prove what we all suspected: High-ranking FBI officials involved in the Clinton investigation were personally invested in the outcome of the election, and clearly let their strong political opinions cloud their professional judgment,” said House Judiciary Chairman Bob Goodlatte, a Virginia Republican.

Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein — who appointed Mueller after Sessions recused himself from all campaign-related matters — found himself in the unenviable position Wednesday of urging that lawmakers see a fine distinction between political affiliation and bias, while offering a strikingly uncompromising defense of Mueller and the integrity of his investigation, calling him an “ideal choice for this task.”

Rosenstein encouraged the House panel to await the results of the inspector general’s investigation, of which the texts are a pertinent part.

The Justice Department has agreed to make Stzrok available for interviews with congressional investigators.

Strzok and Page regularly traded barbs on a variety of political figures from independent Sen. Bernie Sanders to Ohio Gov. John Kasich, but Republican lawmakers appear to have zeroed in on specific texts that they say may have moved beyond name-calling.

In one instance, highlighted in a tweet by Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, Page references a phone so that she and Strzok could “talk about Hillary because it can’t be traced” — raising questions about whether any messages on additional devices exist.

In another text sent in August 2016, after the Clinton investigation closed, Strzok says, without explanation: “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office” — an apparent reference to Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe — “that there’s no way he gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk. It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die before you’re 40 . . . .” Page does not appear to have responded, according to records reviewed by CNN.

The text doesn’t directly mention the FBI’s ongoing counterintelligence efforts on Russian meddling in the election, but the timing of it means it was sent in the early weeks of the FBI’s probe into potential contacts between Russian operatives and Trump campaign associates. It doesn’t, however, answer what “path” was being evaluated within the FBI at the time.

Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn, a Texas Republican, told reporters Tuesday that Mueller needs to “clean house.”

“I think he needs to vet the people he’s working with, because I think he’s undermining public confidence in his own investigation by having people that have been so politically active and who have made critical comments of the President and his team,” Cornyn added.

Meanwhile, others have pointed to the fact that Mueller is a lifelong Republican, and they say attempting to correlate Democratic political contributions made by his team members over the years with biased work will only result in a rabbit hole of hypocrisy when some top Justice officials have a history of donations to Republicans.

Pointing to those Republican contributions Wednesday, Rep. Ted Lieu, D-California, suggested that it is a “silly argument” to claim “if a Department of Justice employee exercises a First Amendment right to make political contributions that somehow that they cannot do their job,” and shows “a desperation that some people have about the Mueller investigation.”

Compounding the notion pushed by Trump, his advocates in the media and some Republicans on Capitol Hill that the Justice Department’s “deep state” is out to get the President is the case of Bruce Ohr, the Justice Department official now in the crosshairs of an unproven theory connecting him to the Trump dossier.

Less than a week after news of Strzok’s texts broke, Fox News reported that Ohr had been demoted amid the discovery of certain meetings with Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson and Christopher Steele, the former British intelligence officer who assembled the dossier. (The exact timing and number of meetings is not yet public.) On Monday, Fox News also reported that Ohr’s wife, Nellie, worked for Fusion GPS during the 2016 election, according to House Intel Committee investigators.

Simpson provided more detail about his interactions with the couple in an unrelated court submission Tuesday, explaining that the firm contracted with Nellie Ohr to help with its “research and analysis of Mr. Trump,” and that Simpson met with Bruce Ohr, “at his request, after the November 2016 election to discuss our findings regarding Russia and the election.”

The story has drawn attention because certain congressional investigators have demanded that the Justice Department explain the extent to which the dossier served as the FBI’s basis to apply for warrants to conduct surveillance under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act on Trump associates.

But what remains unclear is why Bruce Ohr requested the meeting with Simpson and what was said at his meeting with Steele.

Nevertheless, the President’s lawyer, Rep. Jim Jordan of Texas and other Republicans have called for a second special counsel to investigate.

“Think about what we’ve learned in the last several weeks. We first learned who paid for the dossier, then we learned about Peter Strzok and last week we learned about Bruce Ohr and his wife, Nellie. I mean this is unbelievable,” Jordan said Wednesday.

Rosenstein tried to explain to the House panel that while Ohr, a career Justice official, worked in his office up until last week, Ohr had no role in the Russia investigation.

Where do the past two weeks leave the Justice Department as Mueller plows through his investigation?

Officials there are girding for the inspector general’s office to drop a detailed report that’s been in the works since January and will address the FBI’s handling of the Clinton email probe, including then-FBI Director James Comey’s controversial move to announce less than two weeks before the presidential election the discovery of additional emails potentially relevant to the investigation of Clinton, and whether FBI Deputy Director McCabe should have been recused from the case for alleged ethical conflicts surrounding his wife. Jill McCabe ran for political office in Virginia as a Democrat and received contributions from then-Governor Terry McAuliffe, a close friend of the Clintons.

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz told congressional committees this week that his team uncovered “politically oriented text messages” between Page and Strzok as part of their review, alerted Rosenstein and Mueller, and is in the process of completing witness interviews.

Meanwhile, Trump’s allies appear ready to take aim at another target on Mueller’s team: prosecutor Andrew Weissmann.

An email from January shows the lawyer applauded his then-boss, acting Attorney General Sally Yates, for refusing to enforce the President’s original travel ban, and Weissmann also attended election-night festivities for the Clinton campaign at the Javits Center in New York, according to a report by The Wall Street Journal.

But even the most vocal critics of Mueller’s team and the Justice Department, like Republican Rep. Trey Gowdy of South Carolina, appear to recognize that top officials are stuck between a rock and a hard place on many of these issues.

“Rosenstein’s got a really hard, maybe impossible, job, which is defending a bunch of stupid decisions that other people made,” Gowdy said.

And December isn’t over yet.