The term “trade war” has always sounded dramatic — almost too dramatic for what many hoped would be a technical dispute over economic leverage.
But wars, whether military or monetary, are rarely clean, and they often end differently than they began. The latest developments in the Trump administration’s tariff policy — particularly the sharp reversal on China — are proof of that.
At the start of this saga, the White House levied tariffs on virtually all trading partners, signaling a tough, America First approach to trade. It was bold. It was disruptive. And for a time, it forced nations like China to take a second look at their trade imbalances with the United States.
Eventually, the strategy shifted: tariffs were lifted on most countries, leaving China squarely in the crosshairs. Thus began a prolonged tit-for-tat tariff battle between the world’s two largest economies.
At one point, tariffs on Chinese imports reached a staggering 145% — a punitive figure intended to inflict economic pressure and bring Beijing to the negotiating table.
And in some ways, it worked. China’s economy felt the pain, and U.S. manufacturing began to regain some breathing room, and trade relations re-centered around key American concerns like intellectual property theft and forced tech transfers.
But now, the Trump administration appears to be walking back many of these measures. According to recent reports, the White House is considering substantially slashing tariffs on Chinese goods, including granting waivers on tech products like iPhones and semiconductors.
It’s not just a tweak — it’s a meaningful retreat.
The question now is: Was this part of a long-game strategy — what Trump would call “The Art of the Deal” — or a case of starting a fight too big to finish?
Let’s be clear. Tariffs can be effective when used surgically and with clear objectives. But when they become a blunt instrument, the pain isn’t limited to the opposing country — it’s felt by American consumers, manufacturers, and small businesses as well.
Higher import costs translate into higher prices, disrupted supply chains, and retaliatory tariffs that hurt U.S. exporters.
In fairness, the Trump administration succeeded in bringing trade to the center of public discourse, after decades of blind allegiance to globalization. But the reversal we’re seeing now threatens to send the wrong message — that America’s trade pressure is a bluff rather than a policy.
Optics matter.
The fact that tariffs are now being scaled back — especially in tech sectors — suggests that domestic political pressures and economic realities may have outpaced the administration’s initial enthusiasm.
Industries dependent on Chinese components, like electronics and automotive manufacturing, have been squeezed. Voters, especially in swing states, are beginning to feel the inflationary effects.
If this is the “deal-making” phase of a broader negotiation, the results better be worth it. Because if the United States retreats without meaningful concessions from China, it will undermine the credibility of using tariffs as a policy tool in future conflicts.
On the other hand, if Trump’s strategy was to apply maximum pressure only to bargain it down later, then this is the moment to show what we got in return: stronger protections for American IP, greater market access, and a reduction in China’s mercantilist behavior. Deals come with receipts.
In either case, the point stands: Tariff wars earn their name for a reason. They may begin with confidence and strong rhetoric, but they end in fatigue, compromise, and unintended casualties.
American farmers, manufacturers, and consumers have all borne the cost in the early stages of this conflict. They deserve to know whether the gains were worth it in the long haul.
If there’s one lesson here, it’s that economic wars are easier to start than to end — and victory must be defined, not just declared.
So, let’s not give Trump a hard time for his tariff tools. If used wisely in the short term in negotiations and as bargaining chips, they may work just fine.
But let’s not get carried away with political vibrato and pressure him to “go to the distance” if that would be unfruitful to Americans and our economy.
Regardless of whether tariffs are long- or short-term, let’s get the Port of America humming with American exports to the world.
Jim Renacci was raised in a blue-collar union family, pursuing the American dream, leading to his operating over 60 businesses, creating 1,500 new jobs, and employing over 3,000 people. As a four-term conservative U.S. congressman, Jim served on the powerful U.S. House Ways and Means and Budget Committees, cutting government spending. Read More of Jim Renacci’s Reports — Here.
© 2025 Newsmax. All rights reserved.
Comments